What do you think of these wedding photos?
What do you think of this photographer's wedding photos? http://kelschsistersphotography.com/html_gallery.cfm?menu_itemID=405307&preview=1&load=html thanks. Which ones are bad?
Public Comments
- gads, I hope no one had to actually *pay* for those.
- the focus and lighting are not the best
- Some are okay, others are obviously not. Not all pictures are perfect, hopefully they didn't have to pay for the bad ones
- I think thier a little different from what i've seen but interesting and pretty. i don't think any of them were bad.
- Not bad. But realize that on a website, the photographer is only going to put up their best stuff. For each of these wedding parties, 95% of the pictures could have been junk, and the one or two amazing pictures are shown. Ultimately, it will be down to what you and your fiancee like. Having been married a long time, I will say, get at least one clear picture of the setting, because 20 years from now, what seems mundane will be just as valuable as the artsy pictures.
- I don't think any of the pictures are necessarily *bad*, just very amateur looking!
- I liked the types of shots she got, but some of them were really blurry. I especially noticed the first black and white one, but there were others. Also, the lighting was off and some of them even looked color enhanced, which is really kind of gauche. There's one towards the end (of the ones I looked at) with grass and flowers that looks like it would glow in the dark.
- I love the one with the bridal party all turned around.
- They could be works... HOWEVER, they aren't that good. Like said, these are the photographer's best... so I can't even imagine their worst! Many of the pictures are out of focus, some of the pictures are cropped weird, and they just really aren't that special. There's nothing about these pictures that make them pop or stand out form the pictures your mom or bridal party might take. In my opinion as a photography student, I wouldn't hire her.
- Bad, bad, B A D! The focus is bad, which means A) Very old or defective equipment B) Sub par equipment c) Inability to operate a camera Secondly, this person has absolutely NO talent. The pictures are CORNY, the lighting is terrible (suggesting no knowledge in the matter, inadequate equipment, or lack of lighting equipment). ZERO creativity and zero talent to enhance people's best features. CORNY poses,... yikes! I can do better with my pocket camera. I wouldn't pay a dime for that amateurish low quality "pictures". If these are the "best" this person has, I don't wanna see the normal ones. Also, the resolution looks no more than 5 mega pixels, you need at least 10 mega pixels (best 12 MP or more) to justify the expense. Awful.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers